The good people of the chair for Network and Data Security at the Ruhr UniversityBochum, Germany are maintaining a blog at https://web-in-security.blogspot.de. Their current hobby is exploiting printers . All of them.
Tumblr of the day is… a wordpress, “A damsel in this dress”, for the blog title and for this image.
»Damian: The solution is to send emails with increasing frequency
@markzabaro: It’s called exponential fuck-off.«
According to NetworkWorld, a man in Ohio with an implanted Pacemaker, was indicted as an arsonist, based on data seized by the Police from his device.
»[T]he cops wanted to know “Compton’s heart rate, pacer demand and cardiac rhythms before, during and after the fire.”« reports a local station, WLWT5.
Another news outlet reports »“A cardiologist who reviewed that data determined ‘it is highly improbable Mr. Compton would have been able to collect, pack and remove the number of items from the house, exit his bedroom window and carry numerous large and heavy items to the front of his residence during the short period of time he has indicated due to his medical conditions.’”« The retrieved data helped to indict Comption, who also had gasoline on various pieces of his clothing.
Kant vs. Hochkant
More further down in the Thread.
Translated from German, original Text by Nicolas Katte:
It’s “lean fascism“, and that’s how it works:
Political positions are no longer backed by theory and no longer subject to political discourse and societal control. They are simply being implemented, sometimes even purposefully badly crafted, in order to measure societal reaction.
The goal of the “Machiavellian Blitzkrieg” which we have been witnessing in the last few days regarding Executive Orders, Planned Parenthood and Muslim Ban is not a single big change. It tries to port the principles of the Lean Startup to politics: Trying to find a path to a goal through tight feedback loops between the island of planning (a company or the government) and the chaotic reaction (the market, or society).
Each executive order is like a minimum viable product: it looks like a law, and is being applied for the first few hours like a law, the reaction of society toward it is being measured as if it was a law. Which offices, which NGOs and which individuals are willing to accept this order, even if it is a violation of the constitution? Who resists? Is the resistance inside the law (e.g. by calling on the rule of law or the constitution) or outside, through protests, organisation or by breaking the law?
The reactions of lawyers and governmental organisations, the Tweets and Facebook posts of all people are being collected and a detailed breakdown of moods and political posture is being created. Of course lists are being updated, maybe even with a score per individual, tracking the change in approval and rejection over time for individuals and organisations. Is the opposition becoming tired, are they worn out?
Protest is part of the plan in the early stages, because just as the positions of Trump initially have been seen as extreme and became normalized over time, protest will be seen as normal over time and find less and less attention. Also, while masses are demonstrating the “muslim ban” it’s easy to change the complete staff of the state department and install your own people instead.
Activities of political opponents as seen from a position of political power are not seen as an opposition to the implementation of the one single policy. Instead each activity of the opposition is seen as a small experiment that is an opportunity to learn and to change. At the same time it keeps the opposition busy while one quietly takes control of the next office of the state.
“Crimes against kerning: the new signs at U-Bhf Mehringdamm” — https://twitter.com/Berlin_Type/status/826023546069585921
The Site Reliability Engineering Book is now available for free as HTML online.
The book describes operational best practices as experienced by Google. Most of then are also applicable at a smaller scale, or can be adjusted to that.
So this happened (Warning: 1st clickthrough opens newsletter subscription window, 2nd clickthrough works, if you accept cookies):
Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information.
This basically destroys all legal groundwork necessary for the Privacy Shield to stand on. Privacy Shield is supposed to be the legal framework that enables US companies to process personally identifiable information (PII) of European Citizens in the US.